Virus Bulletin VBSpam Q4 2024

Test Lab

Virus Bulletin

Test Title

Virus Bulletin VBSpam Q4 2024

AMTSO Test ID

AMTSO-LS1-TP130

Platform

Email Filters

Vendor

Bitdefender, Fortinet, Mimecast, N-able, Net at Work, Rspamd, SEPPmail, Sophos, SpamTitan, Zoho Mail

Publication date

2024-12-18

Statement from Test Lab

VBSpam comparative testing is a regular independent comparison of email security solutions. The aim of these tests is to offer readers the best impartial advice about anti-spam security and the products on offer. By using a combination of multiple live mail streams of spam and malicious emails, representing mailboxes all over the world, as well as a live stream of legitimate international emails, the VBSpam test aims to reflect the experience of a real end-user as accurately as possible.

Tested products

VendorProductVendor status
BitdefenderGravityZone Premiumincluded
FortinetFortimailparticipant
MimecastMimecastincluded
N-ableMail Assureincluded
N-ableSpam Expertsincluded
Net at WorkNoSpamProxyincluded
RspamdRspamdincluded
RspamdRspamd Premiumincluded
SEPPMailSEPPMailparticipant
SophosSophos Emailincluded
TitanHQSpamTitan 6.00included
Zoho Mail Zoho Mailincluded

AMTSO Standard compliance info

Notification issued

2024-10-16

Notification method

Publicly posted test plan, Contact list notification

Test plan

Commencement date

2024-11-02

Participants

1
These Vendors chose to adopt Participant status under the AMTSO Standard, gaining certain guaranteed rights in return for attestations.

“Included” Vendors

10

These Vendors did not chose to adopt Participant status under the AMTSO Standard, but may have engaged with the test lab in other ways.

Commentary dates
CommentaryStart dateEnd date
Phase 1 Commentary2024-10-162025-01-07
Phase 2 Commentary2025-01-072025-01-14

Commentary received

VendorCommentary phaseComment
SEPPMailPhase 2

“The test plan doesn’t mention a minimum required number of mails in each category. Having only 26 newsletters, a single misclassified newsletter will disqualify you from the best category “SPAM+”. We would appreciate either to remove this criteria or to have a minimum sample size for each category.”

“As a vendor, we put much higher importance on blocking phishing and malwares, compared to properly classifying newsletters. Unfortunately, the scoring mechanism doesn’t make a difference if you let through an “annoyance” spam or a malware that would infiltrate the whole company. We wish malwares and phishes were weighted differently in the catch rate and that the cutoff of maximum newsletters FPs were higher or even removed.”

Response from test lab:

“Virus Bulletin investigated this issue and confirmed that significantly fewer newsletter emails than usual were included in this test. This resulted in a reduced resolution for this segment of the data. The decline in numbers was caused by an unexpected but natural drop in the number of newsletters received from ‘in-the-wild’ sources. Virus Bulletin acknowledges this vendor feedback and will take it into consideration moving forward.”

 

AMTSO Standard compliance status

Confirmed Compliant with AMTSO Standard v1.3Compliance report